Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Mmmmm, rack of rat

Like many Americans I’m so thrilled to hear that Smithfield Foods has decided to sell out to Shuanghui International, a Chinese food processing company with a less than stellar reputation.

As a matter of fact, the company has a downright lousy track record and reputation – in China and abroad.

So, I guess the nation and, particularly Virginia, can kiss the company (and more jobs) goodbye in a year or so. After all, once word spreads about the sellout (and I do mean that term literally) and citizens learn of Shuanghui’s food production practices there won’t be many of their product sold.

I hope Smithfield executives enjoy the extra dollars in their pockets and don’t mind watching the reputation of a company founded in 1936 dive into the abyss. Surely there was another company that could have purchased Smithfield; maybe one that hasn’t had executives hanged for killing babies with melamine-tainted milk powder.

It seems 13th District Delegate Bob Marshall is so incensed by the sale that he has written a letter to Smithfield CEO C. Larry Pope chastising him for not only destroying the name of the company, but also putting Virginia jobs at risk.

“I think this sale is the wrong decision for Smithfield and Virginia,” Marshall states in the letter. “Inevitably, the Smithfield ‘brand’ will suffer, and regrettably, so will many Virginians.”

Amen to that.

The letter goes on to list some of the problems found with Shuanghui products since 2009, as reported by International Business Times. These include ribs containing maggots; sausages containing black threads; sausages spoiling before the sell-by date expired, and the baby formula debacle that killed six children and sickened another 300,000.

The Wall Street Journal reports that while food product imports from China continue to rise in the U.S., inspections in China and the U.S. aren’t able to keep up with the pace, thus “posing a growing danger to consumers.” The publication points out that over half of food processing and packaging firms in China failed their safety inspections in 2011.

Marshall tells Pope that these safety problems “will engulf Smithfield Food products regardless of the names under which they are sold.” He points out his family doesn’t buy food products from China “because of significant scandals” that include dog food products that have killed pets and rat meat that was sold as lamb.

Mmmmmm. There’s nothing like a good rack of rat to satisfy your hunger.



2 Responses to Mmmmm, rack of rat

  1. Gary Reber

    July 5, 2013 at 3:06 pm

    The proposed $4.7 billion sale of Smithfield Foods, Inc., America’s and the world’s largest pork producer with 46,000 jobs at stake, to a giant Chinese company supported by the Wall Street firm of Goldman Sachs has raised serious concerns about ownership and control of America’s core industries, i.e., those that meet basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter. This reflects the stranglehold that Wall Street has in super-concentrating capital ownership power, choking the future of a just, free and democratic market economy in America and throughout the global economy — to the detriment of Peace, Prosperity and Freedom for all.

    Equity Expansion International, Inc. (EEI, http://www.eei-consultants.com) proposes that, instead of Americans working for foreign owners or jobs being outsourced to other countries, each person should work for him- or herself. Every American has the natural right to be an owner of capital, as stated in § 17(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and § 1 of the Virginia Declaration of Rights of June 12, 1776. Handled properly, the sale of the Company could lead the way for a rebirth of American economic preeminence in which all Americans participate, and provide a model for the world, restoring American prestige. As a model, a sale to American workers could even help guide the Chinese to a more democratic system, both politically and economically.

    Keeping the Company locally and domestically owned would bring instant bipartisan support in both houses of Congress, while dethroning the monopoly money powers of a Wall Street elite would gain immediate support from many concerned political constituencies throughout the country. We therefore recommend a sale of Smithfield Foods, Inc. to its 46,000 workers through a “JBM S-Corp ESOP” with the following features and on the following terms, all of which are feasible under current U.S. law:

    • An S-Corp ESOP Trust should be established to purchase all outstanding shares of the Company. The purchase should be financed with capital credit extended by a consortium of community banks, small and large, located in Virginia. The loans would immediately be rediscounted at the Richmond Federal Reserve under Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act, thereby ensuring an adequate source of low cost, asset-backed financing without requiring any worker to take reductions in pay, or to invest any of their existing savings. This is consistent with the “Capital Homesteading” proposal of the Center for Economic and Social Justice (CESJ, http://www.cesj.org).

    • Acquisition loan(s) would be repaid from the “future savings” (profits) of the Company itself in the form of annual cash “contributions” to the ESOP, with shares and, later, cash being allocated to workers’ accounts. After the scheduled annual loan repayments have been made, the Company could make additional cash “contributions” to the ESOP, to be invested in a prudent mix of securities, or as profit sharing to supplement take-home pay of all workers. The liquidity in the Plan would be used to repurchase shares from former Participants, build in diversification, and establish an “in-house stock exchange” for Company shares.

    • S-Corps are not subject to corporate income tax. Instead, the shareholders are taxed, whether or not they receive distributions of earnings. The ESOP Trust, as a tax-sheltered and sole owner of a Company organized as an S-Corp, would pay no taxes. Taxes would be paid only when ESOP Participants receive pass-through profit distributions or a distribution of benefits from the Trust. This, to all intents and purposes, makes the Company 50 percent more profitable by eliminating the corporate tax liability, while tax revenues suffer little, if any, diminution due to the increase in Participant income and expansion of productivity and economic growth in the surrounding economy stimulated naturally by increased consumption incomes, avoiding increased labor costs.

    • The human right of all Americans to become an owner demands equal access to the social tools needed to become owners. While the value of each person’s labor to the Company will differ in a just market system, ESOP share allocations should be equal across the board. When each person has equal access to the capital credit to become an owner, equal ownership rights promised to every citizen under Section 1 of the Virginia Declaration of Rights will finally be realized for every citizen.

    • Equal annual allocations should, everything else being equal as well, result in a typical Participant accumulating company shares worth over $100,000 ($4.72 billion/46,000 Participants), plus cash contributions to supplement other savings and labor benefits. When distributed by the ESOP Trust, benefits can be rolled over on a tax-deferred basis into another qualified plan such as an IRA or 401(k) plan.

    • With Justice in worker ownership and bottom-line profits shared by all workers from bottom to top, employees work together naturally for maximizing value and sales to customers. Unions can realize their ultimate commitment to economic and social justice for all members of society when they expand their collective bargaining constituencies, political influence and social value beyond rights of workers as workers, when they work to maximize and protect ownership rights and economic empowerment for all citizens. In a Justice-oriented Company culture, unions would enable members to directly vote their shares and personally participate in all shareholder decisions.

    • In addition to equal annual allocations, the ESOP should include “cliff” instead of graduated vesting (i.e., 100 percent vesting after a predetermined period instead of annual increases), and annual “rebalancing” of accounts, i.e., all Participants having an equal proportion of Company shares to other investments, with adjustments being made each year.

    • A similar effort involving a start-up construction company with innovative products and techniques is currently underway in Cleveland, Ohio. Community leaders are closely watching the project with an eye toward providing a model for the economic revival of the “Rust Belt.”

    • A minor change to current law could be made, extending the § 1042 tax-deferred rollover now available to shareholders selling to C-Corp ESOPs, to shareholders selling to S-Corp ESOPs. This would make a sale to an ESOP Trust more attractive to existing shareholders than a sale to the Chinese meat producer, and gain a significant political constituency among the ESOP community and pro-ESOP Representatives and Senators of both parties who have long been urging such a change.

  2. Joyce F. Murphy

    July 5, 2013 at 4:00 pm

    What does a cooked rat look like? The Chinese restaurants are very good at covering their meats with fancy sauces and even vegies that it would be difficult to ascertain the difference in rats, chicken or beef. Right?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login